Executive Summary
The “who cares a fuck hoodie” represents a fascinating intersection of linguistic evolution, counter-cultural expression, and contemporary fashion trends. This report explores the historical trajectory of the word “fuck” from its medieval origins to its modern usage as an idiom of indifference. It then traces the phrase “who fucking cares” from its satirical genesis in 1990s skateboard culture to its manifestation as a prominent fashion item by brands like Praying. The analysis delves into how this garment embodies a broader philosophical stance on selective apathy, examining its market positioning, public reception, and the complex sociological and psychological dynamics of wearing explicit slogan apparel. The report concludes by summarizing the enduring appeal of such statements and considering future trends in fashion as a medium for rebellious self-expression.
The Etymology of “Fuck”: A Historical Context
The word “fuck” carries a rich and debated history, its journey through the English language providing a crucial backdrop for understanding the provocative nature of the “who cares a fuck hoodie.” Its earliest known appearance in written English dates to a 1310 court case in Chester, where the name ‘Roger Fuckebythenavele’ was recorded.1 This discovery by historian Paul Booth predates the previously accepted earliest use found in the 1475 poem Flen flyys, which included the Latin-English line “fvccant vvivys of heli,” meaning “…they fuck the wives of Ely”.1 While the 1310 reference likely carried a sexual connotation, possibly alluding to an act of frottage or “strike upon the belly,” earlier instances like ‘John le Fucker’ in 1278 are more ambiguous, potentially being a variant spelling of ‘fulcher’ (meaning soldier).1 This early ambiguity underscores the word’s fluid usage before it solidified its explicit meaning.
Linguistically, “fuck” is rooted in Germanic languages, with cognates in Dutch, German, and Swedish that encompass both sexual meanings and connotations of ‘to strike’ or ‘to move back and forth’.1 While some theories connect it to Middle English “fyke” (to move restlessly) or Old English “swifan” (to move lightly), the Oxford English Dictionary notes these links “cannot be shown to be related” to the modern English word.2
By the 1670s, “fuck” was firmly established in English as a noun signifying “an act of sexual intercourse”.2 A significant semantic evolution occurred by 1929, when the phrase “something one doesn’t give when one doesn’t care” emerged.2 This transformation from a literal, often taboo, sexual act to an abstract unit of concern or effort is noteworthy. The very shock value inherent in the word “fuck” is leveraged to amplify the sentiment of indifference, making the expression more potent than milder alternatives.
The phrase “flying fuck,” originally referring to “sex had on horseback” around 1800, also eventually evolved to denote extreme indifference.2 This linguistic adaptation, from a concrete, explicit action to an abstract, expressive idiom, demonstrates how language evolves to convey nuanced emotional states, particularly those related to defiance or detachment from societal expectations. The deliberate choice of “fuck” over less charged terms like “care less” or “don’t mind” imbues the statement with a heightened sense of dismissiveness and rebellion, underscoring the power of profanity in conveying intensity.
The following table illustrates the historical progression of the word and its associated phrases:
| Year | Phrase/Usage | Meaning/Context |
|---|---|---|
| 1310 | ‘Roger Fuckebythenavele’ | Possible sexual connotation; frottage |
| 1475 | “fvccant vvivys of heli” | “…they fuck the wives of Ely” |
| 1670s | “fuck” (noun) | An act of sexual intercourse |
| 1929 | “something one doesn’t give when one doesn’t care” | Unit of concern/effort |
| ~1800 | “flying fuck” | Sex had on horseback |
| Later evolution | “flying fuck” | Extreme indifference |
This chronological overview provides a clear understanding of the word’s development, highlighting the critical semantic shift from literal sexual meaning to an abstract expression of apathy, which forms the core message of the hoodie.
From Skateboard Culture to Slogan: The “Who Fucking Cares” Genesis
The phrase “Who Fucking Cares” did not originate in a vacuum but found its genesis within the irreverent pages of Big Brother skateboard magazine around 1995.3 Proposed by Mark Lewman, the column was conceived with a deliberately satirical intent: to discuss subjects utterly irrelevant to skateboarding, such as tropical bird care or Scandinavian spa maintenance.3 This approach was a meta-commentary on the magazine’s own content, often extending to self-congratulatory adulations.3
A crucial element of the column’s title was the intentional omission of a question mark, transforming what could have been a query into a definitive, declarative statement of indifference.3 This grammatical choice amplified the dismissive nature of the phrase, signaling that the content was not open to debate or seeking validation. When this phrase is emblazoned on apparel, it carries the same declarative weight, projecting an unyielding attitude of apathy rather than inviting a response. This demonstrates how even minor stylistic choices can significantly alter the perceived meaning and impact of a slogan.
The ethos of Big Brother magazine, characterized by its irreverence and anti-establishment stance, fostered an environment where such a dismissive phrase could thrive.3 This counter-cultural space served as an incubator for language and attitudes that would later diffuse into broader popular culture, including fashion. The deliberate irrelevance expressed with explicit language resonated with a youth demographic already inclined towards anti-establishment sentiments. The phrase effectively captured a prevailing sentiment of apathy towards conventional concerns, allowing it to transition from a niche print column to broader wearable merchandise.
The existence of the “Who the Fuck Cares” T-shirt by Aerwear 4 and the “Who Cares A F Hoodie” by Praying 5 clearly illustrates this successful leap, indicating its adoption as a wider cultural slogan. This progression highlights how what begins as subversive humor within a specific subculture can become a widely recognizable, albeit still provocative, mainstream fashion statement.
The “Who Cares A F Hoodie” by Praying: Brand and Aesthetic
The “Who Cares A F Hoodie” is a flagship product of Praying, an American ironic-fashion label known for its distinctive “post-internet inspired womenswear” and embrace of “post-woke guilty pleasures”.7 The brand’s aesthetic is defined by sarcastic, often outrageous phrases and motifs, heavily drawing from pop culture references like Twilight, Lana Del Rey, and Brangelina, as well as niche “girl-blogger” or “terminally online” aesthetics.7 Praying employs oversimplified graphics, multi-placement prints, and serif fonts, injecting a “tongue-and-cheek spin to contemporary ready-to-wear”.8
A notable characteristic of Praying’s designs is the juxtaposition of religious iconography with irreverent slogans, playing into a “Catholic Core” trend and an ironic reclamation of repressive structures.7 This intentional ambiguity allows for diverse interpretations of their slogans, such as “You Don’t Matter, Give Up” versus “You Matter, Don’t Give Up,” contributing to the brand’s edgy and exclusive ethos.7 Praying primarily targets Gen Z, and its designs resonate strongly with this demographic’s trends on Instagram, cultivating a significant cult following that includes influential celebrities like Olivia Rodrigo and Blackpink’s Lisa.9 It is important to note that the fashion brand “Praying” is distinct from “Pray.com,” a spiritual app.12
The “Who Cares A F Hoodie” itself is a casual, stylish unisex garment available in sizes ranging from XS to XXL.5 It features an “Allover washed treatment,” brand embroidery on the hood, and the prominent “Who Cares A F” print on the front.13 Additional features include a front zipper closure, two front pockets, and ribbed collar, cuffs, and hem.13 Priced at $165.00, the hoodie is positioned as a premium item within the ironic fashion segment.5 Praying’s “all sales are final” return policy, attributed to the merchandise’s exclusive nature and high demand, reinforces a deliberate strategy to maintain desirability and perceived scarcity.5
The success of the “Who Cares A F Hoodie” demonstrates how brands effectively commodify and market a sense of apathy or ironic rebellion, particularly to younger generations. By pricing the hoodie at a premium and maintaining an exclusive sales policy, Praying is not merely selling clothing; it is selling an attitude and a sense of belonging to an “edgy, exclusive ethos”.7 This suggests that consumers are willing to pay for apparel that allows them to express a curated form of indifference or rebellion, reflecting a powerful market trend. The brand’s intentional ambiguity further enables consumers to project their own interpretations onto the product, making it broadly appealing to those who wish to appear detached or “post-woke.”
However, there is a compelling paradox at play: while wearing a “Who Cares A F” hoodie ostensibly expresses indifference, it simultaneously makes a very deliberate statement about the wearer’s identity and values. The core message of “not giving a fuck” is about the selective allocation of one’s concerns.14 Yet, the conscious decision to display this message on a prominent item of clothing is an active choice. This act of wearing, especially from a brand known for its “tactical rage bait” and “edgy” appeal 7, signals a desire to communicate something about oneself.16 It suggests an alignment with a specific cultural stance—perhaps a rejection of mainstream anxieties, a declaration of self-reliance, or an embrace of ironic detachment. Therefore, the act of wearing the hoodie contradicts its literal message of indifference, revealing a deeper intention to project a particular identity or attitude. This highlights the performative aspect of fashion, where even the act of “not caring” becomes a carefully constructed public statement.
The following table provides a concise overview of the hoodie’s key characteristics:
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| Brand | Praying |
| Garment Type | Unisex Hoodie |
| Slogan | “Who Cares A F” |
| Price | $165.00 |
| Target Demographic | Gen Z |
| Key Features | “Allover washed treatment,” brand embroidery, front zipper, pockets, ribbed collar, cuffs, and hem |
| Return Policy | “All sales are final” |
This detailed breakdown of the product’s attributes and associated policies provides concrete information, illustrating its market positioning as a premium, exclusive item within the ironic fashion landscape.
Cultural Significance: The Philosophy of Indifference
The “who cares a fuck hoodie” is more than just a piece of clothing; it is a tangible representation of a pervasive cultural mindset: the philosophy of “not giving a fuck.” This phrase is widely recognized as a pathway to confidence and success, frequently employed to describe individuals who appear unfazed by external pressures or trivialities.14 This perspective is extensively explored in popular self-help literature, notably Mark Manson’s The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fck*.
Manson posits that genuine “not giving a fuck” is not about true apathy but rather a deliberate, selective choice of what to care about.14 He argues that individuals possess a “limited number of fucks to give” and must judiciously allocate them, especially as they mature and recognize that not “everything seems to matter so much”.14 The hoodie serves as a wearable declaration of this selective indifference. It acts as a public signal that the wearer has consciously chosen to disregard certain societal norms, opinions, or anxieties. This aligns with a common aspiration in contemporary culture: to project an image of self-assurance and detachment.
The explicit nature of the slogan amplifies this message, making it unequivocally clear that the wearer is not merely mildly indifferent but profoundly dismissive of what they deem irrelevant. The existence and popularity of the “Who Cares A F Hoodie” exemplify a broader trend: the commercialization of philosophical or psychological concepts into consumer products. Mark Manson’s work popularizes the idea that “not giving a fuck” is a strategic allocation of emotional energy.14 By displaying this phrase, the hoodie effectively sells a tangible representation of this philosophy. This indicates a market demand for products that enable individuals to outwardly express internal states or aspirational mindsets. The garment becomes a convenient shorthand for a complex personal philosophy, making it accessible and digestible for mass consumption, even if the wearer’s engagement with the underlying philosophy is superficial.
This phenomenon also reveals a tension between authenticity and performance. While the “not giving a fuck” philosophy advocates for genuine indifference to trivialities, wearing a hoodie proclaiming this can be perceived as a performative act, potentially undermining the very authenticity it aims to project. Manson’s philosophy centers on the internal process of choosing what truly matters and releasing what does not.14 However, when this internal state is externalized and advertised on clothing, it enters the realm of public display. A wearer might genuinely embody the philosophy, but the public display could also be interpreted as an attempt to appear indifferent rather than genuinely being so. This dynamic highlights the complex relationship between identity, self-expression, and consumerism in modern society, where even a stance of detachment can become a carefully crafted public persona.
Controversies and Public Reception
The public reception of explicit slogan apparel, including items like the “who cares a fuck hoodie,” is often varied and complex. Reactions can range from understanding it as “tongue in cheek” to finding it “cringe” or overtly offensive.18 Some observers perceive explicit slogans as a recent and negative shift in fashion trends, viewing them as “cringey”.19 Historically, slogan tees have served as powerful vehicles for political and social statements, exemplified by “I can’t breathe” for the Black Lives Matter movement, Katharine Hamnett’s “Choose Life,” or Vivienne Westwood’s provocative punk tees.16 Ironic slogans constitute a significant contemporary trend, often blending luxury awareness with satire.22 However, concerns persist about the oversaturation of this trend, which can lead to a loss of originality.22 Some explicit or controversial slogans are strategically designed as “tactical rage bait” or attempts to cultivate an edgy image.7 A stark example of this is a Danish fashion retailer promoting highly controversial and antisemitic slogans, demonstrating the extreme end of provocative apparel.23 There is also an ongoing debate about whether such phrases truly represent rebellion or merely an “unintentional ignorance to culture” when adopted for fashion.24
While extensive, specific controversies directly linked to the “Who Cares A F Hoodie” itself are not detailed in the provided information, the explicit nature of the word “fuck” inherently positions the garment within the broader discourse surrounding controversial slogan apparel. Praying, the brand behind the hoodie, has a history of pushing boundaries and, at times, facing criticism. For instance, the brand issued an apology for an “ableist T-shirt” that read “Special Needs,” which drew significant backlash for being “tone-deaf” and for their subsequent “apology” being perceived as a mere flash sale.25 This incident underscores Praying’s willingness to court controversy and the potential for their “ambiguity” to be misinterpreted or criticized.10
Social media reactions to explicit or provocative apparel can be highly critical, with users commenting on brands “cheaply copy[ing]” others or producing “cringy” designs.19 The association of brands like Praying with influential Gen Z tastemakers, such as Olivia Rodrigo and Blackpink’s Lisa, plays a crucial role in normalizing and mainstreaming explicit or controversial fashion statements.10 While specific celebrities wearing this exact hoodie are not explicitly named, the brand’s connection to these figures undoubtedly boosts its visibility and desirability, effectively legitimizing its edgy aesthetic for a wider audience.11 This process, where celebrity endorsement reduces the perceived risk or shock value for the broader public, can transform what was once considered transgressive into a desirable trend, influencing youth culture to embrace similar apparel. This suggests that the “controversy” of such items may be less about the inherent shock of the words themselves and more about who is wearing them and how that influences public perception and acceptance.
This phenomenon highlights a double-edged sword inherent in ironic and explicit slogans: while they aim for edginess and rebellion, they often navigate a delicate balance between clever commentary and being perceived as “cringey,” offensive, or even exploitative. Praying’s reliance on “ironic phrases” and “tactical rage bait” for the “Who Cares A F” hoodie exemplifies this.7 However, the spectrum of public reaction, from “tongue in cheek” acceptance to outright condemnation as “SO cringe” 18, illustrates the inherent risk. Praying’s past controversy with the “ableist T-shirt” further demonstrates that their intentional “ambiguity” can backfire.10 This suggests that while explicit slogans can attract attention and a niche following, they also carry a significant risk of misinterpretation, backlash, and accusations of insensitivity or cheap shock value, particularly when the irony is not universally understood or when the message touches on sensitive topics.
The Broader Landscape of Rebellious Slogan Apparel
The “who cares a fuck hoodie” is not an isolated phenomenon but exists within a rich and evolving history of fashion that utilizes explicit or anti-establishment slogans. Slogan t-shirts have a long-standing tradition of serving as platforms for political and social commentary. This dates back to Vivienne Westwood’s controversial punk tees in the 1970s, which boldly displayed messages such as “SEX,” and Katharine Hamnett’s political agenda in the 1980s, featuring anti-nuclear statements and the iconic “CHOOSE LIFE” slogan.16 The early 2000s saw a rise in “tongue-in-cheek” or “clap-back t-shirts” with exaggerated, sarcastic phrases like “DUMP HIM” or “MILF IN TRAINING,” often playfully dramatizing traditional gender roles.21 Today, slogan apparel continues to be a popular trend, particularly among Gen Z, serving as a powerful form of self-expression.27
Contemporary examples span a wide spectrum of messages. Some are humorous and sarcastic, such as “I’m Currently Unsupervised” or “I’m Not Arguing I’m Just Explaining Why I’m Right”.28 Others are overtly politically charged and explicit, including slogans like “Zionists Are Not Welcome Here,” “F**k Off Zionists,” “Free Palestine,” and “Global Intifada”.23 Many slogans directly critique societal norms or advocate for social justice, as seen in apparel supporting the Black Lives Matter movement with phrases like “I Can’t Breathe,” or promoting broader causes such as “Liberation for All” and “End Mass Incarceration”.16 Ironic fashion also encompasses copycats of designer slogans, such as “Fèline” for Céline or “Praduh” for Prada, and brands like Vetements, renowned for their “irony designs”.22
The “who cares a fuck hoodie” operates on a spectrum of rebellious expression, ranging from apathetic detachment to overt political activism. The “who cares a fuck” slogan embodies a personal, almost philosophical, rebellion against caring about trivialities.5 This stands in sharp contrast to explicit slogans used for direct political or social causes, such as “Free Palestine” or “I Can’t Breathe”.16 While both categories employ explicit language or strong statements, their underlying intent differs significantly: one expresses individual disengagement, while the other signifies collective engagement for societal change. This distinction highlights that “rebellious” fashion is not monolithic; it serves diverse functions, from individualistic self-expression to collective advocacy, showcasing the versatility of clothing as a medium for communicating defiance.
The increasing prevalence of explicit and politically charged slogans in fashion suggests a shifting societal threshold for what is considered truly controversial, potentially leading to desensitization. What was once genuinely shocking, such as Vivienne Westwood’s “SEX” shirts in the 1970s 21, has paved the way for even more explicit and politically charged statements today.23 The sheer volume and variety of slogan apparel available 28 indicate a market that not only tolerates but actively seeks out provocative messages. This continuous push for edginess, amplified by social media’s demand for “Instagrammable” content 22, risks desensitizing the public to explicit language or strong political statements. Consequently, the definition of “controversial” becomes a moving target, requiring increasingly extreme or nuanced messaging to truly stand out, as evidenced by brands resorting to “tactical rage bait”.7
The following table provides a comparative analysis of various rebellious slogan apparel, illustrating their diverse messages and impacts:
| Slogan | Category | Underlying Message | Example Product/Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Who Cares A F” | Apathetic/Philosophical | Detachment from trivialities | Who Cares A F Hoodie |
| “Choose Life” | Political/Social Commentary | Anti-nuclear, promoting life | Katharine Hamnett T-shirt |
| “I Can’t Breathe” | Activism/Social Justice | Supporting Black Lives Matter | BLM apparel |
| “Zionists Are Not Welcome Here” | Political/Controversial | Critique of Zionism | Various apparel |
| “Fèline” | Ironic/Humorous | Parody of designer brands | Copycat apparel |
This table categorizes diverse examples of slogan apparel, contextualizing the “who cares a fuck hoodie” within a broader trend and highlighting the varied motivations and impacts of different slogans, from personal apathy to political activism.
Sociological and Psychological Impact
The act of wearing slogan apparel, particularly explicit ones, carries significant sociological and psychological implications, especially within youth culture. Individuals often choose to wear slogan clothing to communicate something important about themselves.16 According to fashion psychologist Carolyn Mair, motivations include making a political or social statement, adhering to fashion trends, or simply drawing attention to oneself through clothing.16 Slogans can resonate deeply by tapping into a wearer’s values, beliefs, and personal experiences, making the message more relatable and memorable.16 For Gen Z, slogan apparel is a popular trend for self-expression.27 However, studies indicate that while consumers are generally aware of self-expression through slogans, their intention to express themselves through them can be surprisingly low, and comfort levels with different slogan types vary.27 Wearing a slogan tee can also signify an alignment with a brand’s personality and lifestyle, which may hold more meaning for the wearer than the literal slogan itself.17
There is a notable paradox in self-expression through mass-produced slogans. While slogan apparel is ostensibly a tool for individual identity, its widespread production and trend-driven nature can lead to a homogenization of rebellion. If a slogan like “Who Cares A F” becomes a popular trend 27 and is mass-produced by brands like Praying 5, the act of wearing it shifts from unique self-expression to participation in a collective trend. The “originality it offers dies down” when ironic fashion becomes “too mainstream”.22 This creates a tension: individuals seek to express their unique identity or rebellious spirit through items that are, by their very nature, designed for broad appeal and consumption. This suggests a conflict between the desire for authenticity and the realities of commercial fashion, where even rebellion can become a form of conformity to a specific aesthetic.
The impact of explicit slogan apparel on youth culture and perceptions of rebellion versus conformity is complex. Such clothing provides a means for individuals, particularly youth, to stand out and advocate for causes.17 The choice to wear explicit slogans can signal a willingness to make a public point and to handle potential feedback or responses.17 However, wearing such slogans can also inadvertently label individuals as belonging to a particular group, and cultural differences can lead to significant misinterpretation, especially with humorous or ironic slogans.17 The rise of ironic fashion, while initially a form of nonconformity, risks becoming mainstream and losing its subversive edge.22 This raises questions about whether wearing such apparel is genuinely rebellious or merely conforming to a new, albeit edgy, trend. Furthermore, some explicit slogans, when worn without a full understanding of their cultural origins or implications, can be perceived as offensive or culturally ignorant.24
A significant aspect of the sociological impact of explicit slogan apparel is the potential disconnect between what the wearer intends to communicate and how the message is received by others, particularly across different social contexts or cultural backgrounds. Studies suggest that not all wearers are deeply committed to the slogan’s meaning, as their intention to express themselves might be low despite awareness of self-expression.27 Carolyn Mair emphasizes that slogans can be interpreted differently across cultures or by individuals with varying viewpoints, especially those intended to be ironic.17 For example, a “Who Cares A F” hoodie might be seen as edgy or self-assured by one group but offensive, juvenile, or even aggressive by another. This indicates that the “impact” of such clothing is not solely determined by the wearer’s psychology but is a dynamic interplay with the audience’s interpretation, potentially leading to misunderstandings or unintended social consequences.
Conclusion and Future Outlook
The “who cares a fuck hoodie” serves as a compelling case study in the evolution of language and its manifestation in contemporary culture and fashion. Tracing its journey from the medieval origins of the word “fuck” to its adoption as an idiom of indifference, and subsequently to its satirical genesis in Big Brother skateboard magazine, reveals a consistent thread of defiance and expressive intent. Brands like Praying have effectively capitalized on this sentiment, transforming a counter-cultural declaration into a high-priced fashion item that embodies a philosophy of selective indifference. This commodification, while making the message widely accessible, also highlights a paradox where the act of wearing a statement of apathy becomes a deliberate, performative act of identity.
The enduring appeal of explicit slogan apparel, particularly among younger generations, stems from its directness and its capacity for self-expression in an increasingly complex world. These garments allow individuals to project a curated persona, whether it be one of detached coolness, political conviction, or ironic humor. The power of these statements lies in their ability to challenge norms, provoke thought, or simply communicate a personal stance without extensive verbal articulation.
Looking ahead, the landscape of ironic fashion and subversive messaging is likely to continue its rapid evolution. Brands will face ongoing challenges in maintaining authenticity and avoiding backlash as they push boundaries with explicit content. The fine line between clever commentary and being perceived as “cringey” or offensive will remain a critical navigation point. The widespread prevalence of explicit messaging in fashion may lead to further desensitization, potentially necessitating even more extreme or nuanced forms of expression for items to truly stand out. Social media’s role will remain paramount, acting as both an amplifier for trends and a rapid-response forum for controversies related to slogan apparel. As societal norms around public expression continue to shift, the “who cares a fuck hoodie” and its successors will undoubtedly continue to reflect and shape the cultural conversations of their time.
Works cited
The earliest use of the F-word – Medievalists.net, accessed July 9, 2025, https://www.medievalists.net/2023/08/earliest-use-f-word/
Fuck – Etymology, Origin & Meaning, accessed July 9, 2025, https://www.etymonline.com/word/fuck
who fucking cares – StrangeLove Skateboards, accessed July 9, 2025, https://strangeloveskateboards.com/blogs/strangelove/who-fucking-cares
WHO THE FUCK CARES Tshirt – Aer Wear, accessed July 9, 2025, https://aerwear.com/products/who-the-fuck-cares-tshirt
Who Cares A F Hoodie – Praying, accessed July 9, 2025, https://prayingg.com/products/who-cares-a-f-hoodie
accessed January 1, 1970, https://modesens.com/product/praying-mens-who-cares-a-f-hoodie-165-29656819/
Praying. Originally published by Farrago… | by Chiaki Chng – Medium, accessed July 9, 2025, https://medium.com/@chiakichng/praying-5a8b1e576f1e
Praying – CLOTHBASE, accessed July 9, 2025, https://clothbase.com/brands/praying
Praying, JJJJound, and Virgil Abloh: the Internet and Fashion. – The WALK Mag, accessed July 9, 2025, https://www.thewalkmag.com/blog-2-3/ldv53hx5ypams0of38nd3udesysfxz
God’s Favorite: Praying | Office Magazine, accessed July 9, 2025, https://officemagazine.net/gods-favorite-praying
“Praying”: Lisa and Olivia Rodrigo’s favourite brand is making waves, accessed July 9, 2025, https://www.voguehk.com/en/article/celebrity/praying-brand-interview/
What is Customer Demographics and Target Market of Pray.com Company?, accessed July 9, 2025, https://canvasbusinessmodel.com/blogs/target-market/pray-com-target-market
Who Cares A F Hoodie | HBX – Globally Curated Fashion and Lifestyle by Hypebeast, accessed July 9, 2025, https://hbx.com/men/brands/praying/who-cares-a-f-hoodie-black
The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fuck – Mark Manson, accessed July 9, 2025, https://markmanson.net/not-giving-a-fuck
Review: The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck – Peter Akkies, accessed July 9, 2025, https://peterakkies.net/blog/review-the-subtle-art-of-not-giving-a-fck
How Impactful Slogans on T-Shirts Can Inspire Change | R&P Prints, accessed July 9, 2025, https://printscanada.com/blog/how-impactful-slogans-on-t-shirts-can-inspire-change/
What a Fashion Psychologist Thinks of Your Slogan T-Shirt Choices – Who What Wear, accessed July 9, 2025, https://www.whowhatwear.com/slogan-t-shirt-psychology
Do you or have you owned an item with an offensive slogan? : r/AskUK – Reddit, accessed July 9, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskUK/comments/1k0zduo/do_you_or_have_you_owned_an_item_with_an/
Is any one else tired of corny words/quotes on the clothing? It’s giving forever 21 – Reddit, accessed July 9, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/TeddyFresh/comments/17krvy6/is_any_one_else_tired_of_corny_wordsquotes_on_the/
What are your most iconic examples of fashion as political statements? – Reddit, accessed July 9, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/femalefashionadvice/comments/gf831r/what_are_your_most_iconic_examples_of_fashion_as/
Slogan tees are back: here’s why – Culted, accessed July 9, 2025, https://culted.com/slogan-tee-frank-ocean-t-shirt-fashion-vivienne-westwoo/
Ironic Fashion: Here to Stay? – a magazine, accessed July 9, 2025, https://theamag.com/3666/fashion/ironic-fashion-here-to-stay/
Danish Fashion Retailer Promotes Hamas Terror and Antisemitism With ‘Global Intifada’ Clothing Line, accessed July 9, 2025, https://combatantisemitism.org/cam-news/global-intifada-fashion/
Retail Confusion and Graphic Tee